Current Affairs - This new section explains Jean's take on current events.
The Withdrawal of the Commission:
European affairs have taken the spotlight recently in the national media following the presentation and then withdrawal of the new Commission.
Prior to the hearings, Jean met informally with the Nominee Commissioner for Social Affairs, Vladimir Spidla. Jean highlighted the key areas that she wanted to see addressed by the Commission in the next mandate. These include sustainable development, working time and anti-discrimination. She also mentioned the greening of training and alternative solutions in transport.
On the basis of the Hearings it became apparent that the democratically elected Parliament had grave misgivings about particular members of the nominee Commission. Certain Consequently, at the eleventh hour, the Commission President José Manuel Barroso was forced to withdraw the proposed Commission saying that he needed more time but that he could be counted on to represent the views of the Parliament. We await his new proposal.
For Jean there were clearly errors all along the line, from the original nominations, in the allocation of posts and a total misreading of the Civil Liberties Committee vote. This was reflected by the high number of constituency letters we received expressing disapproval with Rocco Buttiglione being the most controversial.
For Jean Lambert, this is a question of competence. The views he holds on certain issues could be held by someone of any religion or none: the title of his religious belief is not the issue. The problem is that he has responsibilities under the Treaties which he has made clear run counter to his conscience and he has not shown us how he will handle this. Indeed, his behaviour since designation demonstrates that he does not even see that he has a problem.
There are also problems with some other Commissioners designate in terms of competence or conflicts of interest so even without Buttiglione, Jean would still have voted against this Commission had a vote taken place.
Parliament should probably have pushed for a vote in order to provide greater clarity and a clear mandate for Barroso to demand the withdrawal of certain nominations. He should now organise an extensive reshuffle of portfolios to deal with all the issues raised about conflict of interest and competency. Ideally we would now get an environment Commissioner with a total commitment to sustainable development!
The most important conclusions to be drawn from this series of events is that the current system of nomination and assent must be improved upon. Member states should offer three possibilities each and Parliament should be able to reject or accept on an individual basis. That way, we could see more women in the Commission, the President could have a way out of some the difficulties posed by single nominations and Parliament would not have to reject competent people as well as the questionable. Now, we need Council to see sense as well as Barroso. |